Politically correct board game

Wits and Wagers is an easy-to-learn game that is less about what you know and more about how you bet. This trivia game offers up questions to all the players and the answers are all numbers. Players write down their guesses on whiteboards and reveal them to the group. Players then bet, using casino wagering chips, on an answer and receive points for being the closest or betting on the right answer.

This game has more than 1, reviews and a 4. You'll need at least three players for this game, but the more, the merrier — it's a great pick for teams. Helpful review : "A fast paced and fun board game for the whole family. This version of 5-Second Rule: Uncensored is for the adults.

Players are given a category and must name three things that fit that category within five seconds' time. This adult version of the popular original family game 5-Second Rule leaves room for the imagination and is a quick game for players over There is also a Jr. This pick has more than 8, reviews and a 4. It is much more difficult than you would think. Trying to remember what someone else has stated also makes it much harder if the question is passed on.

Brings out the racy side of people on quite a few occasions. In Smart Ass , everyone plays at once, and the louder, the better. Players listen to descriptive statements and compete to name the person, place, or thing in question. Each card lists statements that range from obscure to obvious — be the first to guess it correctly to get points. The game can be played in 30 minutes with up to six players at a time.

Nice that they are quick about min games that you can play as many or little time as you like. Also great that with the clues everyone has a chance. I am not good at normal trivia, but with this format, I am as good as the next player. There is a wide variety of categories and more than questions. Every wrong answer means you lose points. The questions may be too difficult for younger kids, but teenagers and adults will love battling over random questions about Twitter or sailing.

I can't even properly express how much we enjoyed this game!! LOTS of cards to play the game for a long time!! We played it with friends as we celebrated New Year's. We had other games planned to play, but none of us wanted to play the other ones!! We played for about 4 hours with food and bathroom breaks, of course LOL We had soooo many laughs and so many discussions about various topics.

We only have a small handful of cards left before we finish all the cards!! Love this game!! Calling all '90s kids who remember walking the aisles of Blockbuster for your favorite movie: This Blockbuster game is a walk down memory lane and a movie trivia game all in one.

This game has more than 60 category cards and features classic movies. The seal clubbing spin-off rumoured to have been in development for Wii never happened. Probably because I just made it up. But if this bloodbath got the green light, then why not? So Clay Pigeon Hunt has all the same gameplay, all the same smartass dog giggling at your ineptitude and all of the pixel-perfect precision that SD monitors offered in the s.

Why does 'Pac-People' sound so ridiculous? Just goes to show what political correctness can do, folks. Besides, by rights it would have started off as 'Puck People', which makes it sound like it's intended for children under the age of 5 who are being persuaded to try getting into hockey but were previously scared of the puck. I don't know. These are the sorts of connotations game companies agonize over for months when naming their games.

Needless to say, the female Pac-Person would never have her legs so brazenly on show in the promotional images. And the pair would be pursued around the maze by representatives of the living-impaired community, not 'ghosts'. Never use the G-word, folks. They hate that. In Christmas NiGHTS, as your Saturn's internal clock ticks over into December, the evergreen trees become decorated with lights and baubles, the snow becomes infused with sparkles and candy canes What if you're not Christian and you don't want 'Christ' in your gamz?

You know, that game where a little jester dude flies around over the snow and through non-specific hoops in a bid to restore the head of a snowman I love that game. Reminds me of the non-denominational winter holidays of my youth.

There's nothing that can really be done to stop Custer's Revenge being the most un-P. It's all kinds of awful. Literally all kinds. So what better way than to turn it into a game where you censor its foulness? In Censor's Revenge, it's up to you to win enough points from pixellating the pixellated visuals in suspect places to be able to buy Custer some trousers.

There's no need to free the girl--she's not even present in this version. A bonus level lets you collect up every copy of the game that ever existed and set fire to it.

Bonus points are awarded if you can lobby the developers into reconsidering their stance on exploitative and moral issues raised by the game. You win when the rating is either reduced to a 'Universal C', or it's censored so extremely, the entire screen is only one completely inoffensive pixel. Too bad for you i'm used to debating them and the SPIN they put on everything.

To your first point about Napalm, so what? We weren't involved, nor did we use, supply, or sell. You quoted a roundabout citation from a less than unbiased UK newspaper that proved nothing. I'm here for proof sir, not tabloid news.

Show me a military report that states the US sold, gave away, or used Napalm against accordance to the treaty set in Second point, DDT.

Wow, just wow. Do you write crap about the guy who invented lead based paint? Do you accuse him of being as bad as you're accusing the US? First of all, the US didn't invent it, they merely started using it and promoting it. Secondly, there is a long list of harmful chemicals and inventions used and adopted around the world that later showed some sort of negative trade off.

So really, get off your high horse and stop grasping at straws as to what you can pin on the US. Would you rather them use rubber bullets and tear gas full force? Rubber bullets kill, so do bean bags. Or would you rather they just use harsh language to break up crowds?

And just to beat you to the punch since you're obviously so well read, the US has also invented a "heat" laser that causes the subjects skin to feel unbearably hot due to waves of energy. It doesn't cause burns, nor does it have any long lasting side effects, but it disperses crowds. I bet you're gonna moan about that one here in a few too, right? Fourth point, really, you're gonna submit IBC as a credible and reliable source for who did what and who was responsible for deaths?

It's a left based independent action company that is serving it's own agenda. It's like any other pinko liberal ran organization that will skew any of the numbers it can to prove it's point. If you really wanted to get your point across, you would have used figures from reputable organizations like the Red Cross.

But I digress And lastly, sure, prove to me that we're there for war profiteering. With as many nations out there that opposed the war and opposed US intervention, I'm sure there is an official goverment report somewhere that backs your claim if it's real. Originally posted by Treize Khushrenada To your first point about Napalm, so what?

Thats what usually happens when people can't win an argument. They label their adversary as ignorant, or in your case "a redneck" when they have no idea of who their arguing against. Just concede dude, cus all you did was earn yourself a warning, but I'll let HRZ give it so no one can say i'm being "biased" here.

Point 1. Yes, we did sale weapons to both sides, but I see no proof or any admittances that we sold illegal weapons. Again, back your claims man. Point 3. Using sound to disburse a crowd is inhumane? That made me really chuckle out loud. Like I said, would you rather they used harsh language to get a crowd to disperse?

Point 5. Besides trolling me as if i'm unintelligent and saying that Georgia's leader, who was Democratically elected, is a dictator, again, why don't you provide some real information. And no, I won't deny that the US may have sold them that sound device, but YOU should be glad they did as it is a less physically hurtful way to disburse a crowd.

Really man, come on, get your head in the game here, or read up on older, more violent ways to break up crowds that some resort to. Point 6. I wasn't saying that military sources were unreliable, I was saying that IBC was because the people who were gathering figures are biased, most likely anti-war, and basically skewing the figures and facts they gather to their liking.

And finally point 7. Besides being off topic completely, all you did was claim there are "documentaries" and such, but no real facts or evidence. Who is making money? Not the US, we've been spending money on Iraq.